Post-patriarchy?

by Jody Sokolower, managing editor of Rethinking Schools
and lead editor for Rethinking Sexism, Gender, and Sexuality

I came of age in the late 60s, when abortion was illegal, women were routinely blamed for getting raped, and we represented less than 5 percent of the lawyers in the country. When I came out in the early 70s, lesbian moms and gay dads were losing custody of their children, LGBTQ couples had no rights when a partner was dying, and teachers had to stay in the closet.

So it’s easy to feel like things are getting better. And it’s true that things have changed. Just a few weeks ago, the Obama administration included gender identity under Title IX—the civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs. Public attitudes about LGBTQ civil rights have changed markedly.

But misogyny and homophobia are alive and well. Nowhere is that clearer or more damaging than in our schools. Just a couple of months ago, Candler Elementary School in North Carolina school banned a 9-year-old boy from using his “My Little Pony” backpack because it was making him a target for bullies. Rather than working with the children who were taunting and attacking him, they blamed the child for “triggering” the incidents. Twenty-six states say abstinence must be taught as the best method of birth control. Gay and transgender youth are 5-7 percent of the nation’s overall youth population, but 13-15 percent of those in the juvenile justice system.

How can we change the terms? Before Rethinking Schools published Rethinking Columbus in 1991, “Columbus discovered America” was how the history got taught. Now, 300,000 copies later, the conversation has changed. It’s not perfect, but the real history of colonial conquest has made its way into classrooms everywhere.

We need to do the same with sexism, gender, and sexuality. Rethinking Schools has been working intensely in the past few years to cultivate and support the writing of teachers, students, parents, and teacher educators who are doing that work. Now we are working on a new book to bring it all together.

9780942961591.MAIN

Rethinking Sexism, Gender, and Sexuality is built on the premise that we need to build social justice communities in our schools—places where everyone is nurtured as the unique and wonderful being they are, and where tensions and conflicts are acknowledged and resolved.

Equally important is the integration of sexism, gender, and sexuality into the curriculum. Fighting misogyny and homophobia are not issues just for the hallways and playground—struggles, heroes, and problems need to be acknowledged in our history, our literature, and our sciences.

We’re now in the last few days of a crowdfunding campaign to fund Rethinking Sexism, Gender, and Sexuality. We can’t publish without this support. Our goal is $20,000 and we’re almost there!

Please: Go to the website for our Indiegogo campaign, check out the video, read the sample articles, and help us make our goal. We’re so close! Give generously and spread the word to friends, relatives, and colleagues.

Rethinking ‘The Lorax’

By Bill Bigelow

On March 2nd, Universal Pictures is releasing the 3-D animated film, The Lorax, based on Dr. Seuss’s classic “environmental” book of the same name. The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC) recently sent out a “Save the Lorax” alert about the incredibly inappropriate marketing partnerships timed to coincide with the release of the film.

Despite the book’s lament about environmental ruin, CCFC reports that corporations are rushing to link their products with the film. For example, the Mazda CX-5 SUV now sports the “Truffula Seal of Approval.” IHOP child menus will offer choices such as Rooty Tooty Bar-Ba-Looty Blueberry Cone Cakes and Truffula Chip Pancakes. And companies like Comcast Xfinity TV, Target, IHOP, and HP will feature online Lorax games and sweepstakes for kids. Save the earth, kids: Buy more stuff!

As CCFC points out, the corporate rush to tie products to a book with a non-consumerist message is “cynical and hypocritical.”

But at the risk of sounding like a grumpy old so-and-so, let me also point out that The Lorax is not without its problems. For example, the book reduces the causes of environmental ruin to individual greed, which does not help children think clearly about the roots of today’s ecological crises. This narrow single-greedy-bad-guy focus does not help readers think about the much scarier prospect of an entire society organized around the quest for profit. And the chief environmental exploiter, the Once-ler, hires all his brothers, uncles, and aunts as workers, which makes it appear that the interests of workers and owners are identical, and that they are all inherently part of the problem. Again, this is not a helpful message for children. Instead of allowing his Swomee-Swans and the Bar-ba-loots to fight for themselves and for their environment, the only opposition comes from the Lorax—who advocates for, but actually disempowers other creatures by sending them off. Finally, in the end, the Once-ler repents, suggesting that there is hope for today’s rapacious Once-lers of the world—if only we can make them see the light.

These problems notwithstanding — or perhaps because of them — The Lorax makes a fine teaching resource. At the Zinn Education Project website, we’ve posted an article of mine that Rethinking Schools published in the early 90s, The Lorax: Revisited and Revised,” and which was reprinted in our 1995 book Rethinking Schools: An Agenda for Change.  In the article, I describe using The Lorax with an after-school class I taught for several years, Literature and Social Change. Students critiqued the book in class and then re-wrote it, in an attempt to re-imagine how we might present environmental problems and their possible solutions. The article also includes excerpts from a delightful and astute “alternative” Lorax, written by students Holly Allen, David Berkson, and Becky Willner — all of whom, many years later, are still doing important social justice work.

Stories like The Lorax are valuable resources to help children develop a critical literacy. Being able to evaluate both the strengths and the weaknesses of a piece of literature—or a political position, or a law, or almost anything else—is an important academic and life skill. And our students are going to need those skills in a world filled with IHOP Truffula Chip pancakes.

Related Resources

 Rethinking Popular Culture and Media, edited by Elizabeth Marshall and Özlem Sensoy. This anthology includes outstanding articles by elementary and secondary public school teachers, scholars, and activists who examine how and what popular toys, books, films, music, and other media “teach.” The essays offer strong conceptual critiques and practical pedagogical strategies for educators at every level to engage with the popular.

Cover, Rethinking Schools volume 23 issue 4 Rethinking Schools Special issue: Teaching for Environmental Justice, Volume 23 Issue 4 — Summer 2009